Monthly Archives: February 2017

Spring Training 2017 – MLB.TV coverage

We’re almost there. Friday marks the first day in 2017 on which those people with an MLB.TV subscription will be able to log on, sit back and watch some baseball.

Yes, it’s only Spring Training.

No, the results don’t matter.

No, you might not recognise the names of most of those playing past the fifth inning.

However, right now, who cares? We haven’t seen MLB teams playing since the epic World Series Game Seven and some baseball is better than no baseball.  If you haven’t eaten all day, even a basic Tesco sandwich can be savoured like a glorious plate of steak and chips.

And the negative points about Spring Training games are accompanied by positive ones. Okay, the games don’t matter so the gut-wrenching tension isn’t there, but sometimes it’s nice just to enjoy a relaxing game without your team’s closer giving you a heart attack. Most of the players in later innings are Minor Leaguers, but that will include prospects that we’ve read about and now get a chance to have a glimpse of in action.

MLB.com is promising to broadcast approximately 300 games via MLB.TV (by my reckoning, there are currently 283 on their list) as well as radio coverage from pretty much every contest. The limited number of games is simply a result of the limited coverage on U.S. TV. The full list of MLB.TV games can be found on MLB.com.

The good thing for us is that the vast majority of Spring Training games are played at around midday local time, so they are evening viewing/listening in the UK rather than in the early hours. One thing to note on that is that most of America moves into Daylight Saving Time in the early hours of 12 March, whilst we don’t move to British Summer Time until 26 March. That means there’s a two-week period in which the usual time difference (Eastern – Florida games – 5 hours behind, Pacific – Arizona games – 8) is reduced by 1 hour.

To make things a bit easier, I’ve created a schedule of the MLB.TV games putting them into UK time. This first installment covers the games up to 11 March. I’ve used grey shading to more clearly separate out the days and then itallicised games that do take place in the early hours. For those games, I have still listed them under the date in which they are played in the States, so, for example, the game on 1 March between the Dodgers and Giants is actually at 1.05 am 2 March for us.

One thing I always add in my MLB.TV Spring Training round-up is that, whilst the TV pictures are great, I love listening to spring games on MLB At Bat just as much.

That’s especially the case when it comes to my own team, the Oakland A’s. I don’t normally listen to the whole game, maybe just the first hour or so, but it’s a great way to catch up on all the stories from Spring Training camp. If it’s a cold and/or rainy British evening after a long day at work, little cheers me up more than being transported across to the sunny, relaxed atmosphere in Arizona courtesy of the A’s radio crew.

If you need any further details about MLB.TV, please take a look at my overview of the 2017 offering and the ever-growing helpful comments from other Brits that use the service.

The early days of Spring Training

We’re in phase one of Spring Training, the point from when the players report to camp up until the games begin.

It has to be a difficult period for team beat writers.

There really isn’t whole lot going on to report about, other than occasionally having to react to news such as the St Louis Cardinals’ young pitcher Alex Reyes requiring Tommy John elbow surgery.

Most of the time, the word count that needs to be fulfilled drives the reporters around different players seeking a story or two about hopes for the season ahead, littered with stories of new players getting used to their new teammates, new pitches being added to a hurler’s arsenal, or a new batting stance that a hitter helps to propel baseballs, and their playing stock, to new heights.

The Oakland A’s are my chosen team and Jane Lee, the MLB.com A’s reporter, has ticked most of the boxes over the past few days with stories on Jesse Hahn “hoping to find early-2015 form”, pitching prospect A.J. Puk resurrecting his curveball and outfielder Rajai Davis’s return to the Green and Gold.

Long gone are the days, captured in Roger Kahn’s wonderful ‘Boys of Summer’, when beat writers could file a few stories and then have a drink with some of the players.

Nowadays, social media is as much a part of the job as writing the main articles. I doubt many people are interested in watching shaky 30-second footage of pitchers throwing in the bullpen, but all the beat writers post them all the same. It proves that pitchers are indeed in Arizona/Florida, that the respective beat writer is there too and the world is still turning. That’s essentially social media in a nutshell. I don’t know if there is a Twitter account that just has someone posting ‘still alive’ every five minutes, but there probably should be.

Anyway, the main news at this time of year centres around injuries. Alongside the Reyes blow, the key points so far have been:

Adrian Beltre has a strained left calf muscle so will miss the opening round of the World Baseball Classic for the Dominican Republic. Meanwhile Adrian Gonzalez is dealing with inflammation in his right elbow and it seems likely that Mexico’s lead player will have to sit out the Classic.

The Washington National’s Max Scherzer has casted doubt on his availability for Opening Day due to a finger injury, whilst another predicted Opening Day starter, the Baltimore Orioles’ Chris Tillman, will definitely miss that assignment as his ongoing recovery from a shoulder injury means he will have a delayed start to the regular season.

The Atlanta Braves’s Sean Rodriguez is likely out for the season having just undergone shoulder surgery after being involved in a car accident.

However, the early contender for most bizarre injury of 2017 has come from Kansas City’s relief pitcher Brian Flynn who will be out for eight weeks having suffered “a broken rib and three minor vertebrae fractures in his back” after falling through a barn roof. The Baseball Prospectus 2017 profile on Flynn notes that “walks continue to be an issue” for him, making it tempting to suggest he couldn’t hit a barn door with a baseball, but can hit a barn roof with his rear end.

Extra-innings rules: trying to solve a problem that isn’t really there

Rob Manfred has shown a willingness to challenge baseball orthodoxy since becoming MLB Commissioner in January 2015.

He has made improving the pace of play a central theme during his two years in the job, to mixed results so far, and over the past week ESPN’s Jayson Stark has reported that Manfred has suggested changes to the strike zone as well as making the intentional walk an automatic award, rather than requiring the pitcher to throw four deliberate balls.

Those two ideas are currently being considered by the Players’ Union, with the intentional walk proposal much more likely to be implemented than the strike zone change; however one further idea is going to be trialled in 2017 that may be a step too far for baseball enthusiasts.

Yahoo! Sports’ Jeff Passan reported this week that MLB are planning to test a new extra-innings rule in the lowest levels of the Minor Leagues this season. This will involve placing runners (or a single runner – the full details are still to be announced) on bases when a game hits extra innings as a way to draw games to an early conclusion. Whilst Joe Torre, MLB’s Chief Baseball Officer, is leading the trial, it seems likely that this is led by Manfred’s ‘pace of play’ mantra and a wider effort to shorten game times.

The extra inning rule is already used in international tournaments. Here there are logical reasons why greatly reducing the chances of a game running 12-13 innings plus can be seen as more necessary. Fields will often be used for multiple games in a day and, with small grounds crews and operational staff compared to Major League set-ups, the impact on the event of a game going deep into extra innings  – let alone the impact on players – is something that is best to avoid.

However, even here there’s an argument that the logistical benefits don’t outweigh the detrimental effect the rule has on the sporting contest. Great Britain lost an extra innings game against Sweden in last year’s European Baseball Championship after they had battled back from a 5-0 deficit. Seeing a tight contest decided by the lottery of runners being placed at first and second base didn’t feel right and I’d think the same if GB had got the better end of the deal on that occasion.

In the Major Leagues, there are enough resources (from players to grounds crew) to absorb the genuine impact of long games. Although us in the UK enjoy a night-game going 5-plus hours and giving us some #BonusBreakfastBaseball, those working at the stadium have every right to be less than delighted by the novelty of a 16-inning game.

Yet that is how the game has always been played. If you’ve already battled through nine innings, a game shouldn’t then be decided by such artificial means.

The real head-scratcher with the plan is why it is deemed necessary. A quick check (i.e. don’t treat the number as complete gospel) on Baseball-Reference Play Index shows there were 55 MLB games that went 12 innings or more in 2016.

The Cleveland Indians and Toronto Blue Jays combined for the longest game of the season. It was a 19-inning contest that was deadlocked at 1-1 from the bottom of the 6th inning until the long scoring drought was ended by Carlos Santana launching a home run off infielder, and very temporary pitcher, Darwin Barney in the top of the nineteenth inning as the Tribe won 2-1.

The game lasted 6 hours 13 minutes.  If that was happening regularly, with games being decided by whose position players could pitch better than the other team’s, then considering changes would be more understandable.

But do we really want to change one of the most fundamental parts of baseball – that there are no draws and you keep playing in the same way until one team wins – just to mess around with barely two percent of games that go 12 innings or longer (based on 2016)?

It seems that they are looking to tackle a problem that isn’t really there.

MLB.TV 2017 subscription details announced

The 2017 MLB.TV subscription details have been announced today.

Once again we can sign up to watch and listen to every MLB game across the season, alongside Spring Training games and the post-season (the latter available to non-US subscribers like us, so not mentioned prominently in the promotional material).

The subscription includes the $20 MLB At Bat app to allow us to use one of any number of different ‘connected devices’ to follow the action, as well as directly through a PC/laptop/Mac.

Same great service, but a Brexit-inspired real-term price increase

The yearly subscription has increased ever-so-slightly on last year’s price, going up from $110 to $113 (note that it was $130 in 2015) and UK fans have to add the 20% VAT on top of that as we have done the past couple of seasons. MLB.com calculates that tax as $22.60 making a total cost of $135.59.

The main change for UK fans is nothing to do with MLB and instead comes back to the Brexit-bashing to the pound which has hurt the exchange rate our end.

Whilst last year’s subscription ($132 with tax) worked out at approximately £91, 12 months on the $135 will set us back £108.  That’s a fair-sized increase for what predominantly will be the same service as last year and whilst that’s no fault of MLB, it will be something UK fans will take into consideration.

As I state every year, the service provided by MLB.TV really is fantastic and the ability to watch live or on-demand every single game across the season (plus Spring Training and the post-season) is something those of us who started watching baseball before broadband could only have dreamed of.

Whether the cost is worthwhile simply comes back to how often you will use it. If you just catch occasional games, especially if you already have the tv coverage via BT Sport, then £100+ may be a bit steep.  If you use it to watch plenty of games (or at least bits of games) every week then it will prove worth every penny.

New features

The new features are described as follows in the promotional details:

“The new array of features, debuting for regular-season games, includes a “team view” in which fans can designate a favorite team and enjoy a custom team-centric experience on supported platforms. Redesigned apps will launch on connected platforms Android TV, FireTV, Xbox and Roku. The HD media player, a responsive, in-page layout experience, will introduce additional playback controls, milestone markers and support for Chromecast and Chromebook”

A redesigned app for the Roku box will be welcome to me as that tends to be the way I watch through my TV, but otherwise the new features don’t look overly exciting at first glance. To be honest, there isn’t a whole lot MLB could add to the service as the reason to buy it is simply the ability to watch lots of games online, rather than too many bells and whistles adding to the mix. It does what it’s there for and does it really well.

Single Team subscription

Last year was the first time that MLB.TV offered a lower-cost subscription for people who bought the service to allow them to watch all of their chosen team’s games. That’s on offer again this year for $87.49, with the sales tax on top ($17.50) making a total of $105 and therefore costing approximately £84.

That’s the theory anyway. There were mixed messages last season as to whether the team package was available to non-US fans. The fact that the payment process allows you to select UK suggests that we will be able to buy this product but it will be good to get confirmation from other British fans in the comments to confirm.

World Baseball Classic excluded

One thing we do know is that the WBC this March will not be available as part of the MLB.TV subscription for us, even though it will be for US subscribers.

The same approach was taken four years ago. It was announced on that occasion that ESPN America (as it was known then) had got the rights for WBC and they did show the vast majority of the games live – with the rest on-demand – so it’s likely that BT Sport will be broadcasting the games this time around.

The rights to WBC are sold separately so it makes some business sense for the national broadcaster (whoever it is in each country) to get exclusive rights to show the event; however it is slightly odd that this international competition – designed to help sell baseball around the world – is only bundled into the MLB.TV subscription for those in the States.

Lots of baseball to enjoy

The annual full MLB.TV and Single-Team subscriptions are available to sign up to right now, with a monthly subscription option likely to be announced in the near future. Those of us on the auto-renewal list should see that take effect just before the Spring Training games get underway on 24 February.

If you have any questions about the subscriptions, please leave a note in the comments and either myself or other MLB.TV subscribers will do our best to help.

Counting down the days to Spring Training

We are now less than three weeks away from the MLB Spring Training games beginning.

Baltimore, Boston, Cincinnati, Detroit, NY Mets, NY Yankees, Philadelphia and San Francisco all play their first full Spring Training game (i.e. against another MLB team rather than a university side) on Friday 24 Februaury, with the rest of the teams getting going the following day.

It tends to be that the start and end of pre-season are when the games are worth a look.

The start of spring merits attention because even a casual pre-season friendly (in British sporting parlance) scratches the baseball itch after nearly four months without any MLB games.

The end of Spring Training offers games between close to full strength teams, wrapped up in the anticipation of the ‘real’ action being about to begin.

The two or three weeks of games between those two points usually are less than enticing; however this year we have the excitement of the World Baseball Classic to more than cover the gap.

It won’t be long before stateside baseball is here again and in the meantime the Australian League Championship Series takes place between 8-12 February and can be seen online.

Who’s gone where?

The first weekend of February is a good time to take stock of the baseball off-season and to get your head around the question of ‘who’s gone where?’.

That led me to go through the essential MLB section on RosterResources.com and to chart out the main additions and losses for every team so far this off-season.

I started with two transactions in mind as the most important and the exercise confirmed that to be the case.

The Boston Red Sox and Cleveland Indians were two of the best teams in the Majors in 2017 and they’ve each made a notable signing this winter to reinforce their status as favourites to battle for the American League World Series spot.

Chris Sale’s trade to Boston from the Chicago White Sox adds an ace to a rotation that already boasted David Price and reigning Cy Young winner Rick Porcello. So long as Sale doesn’t get frustrated and go all Edward Scissorhands on us again, he should be a genuine difference-maker in the AL East.

As for Cleveland, they’ve responded to narrowly losing in the World Series by making an uncharacteristic splash in the free agent market. Few would have put much money on the Indians winning the bidding war for Edwin Encarnacion, but the former Blue Jay is indeed a new member of the Tribe and one of several reasons to be confident that their successful 2016 season will not prove to be a one-off.

What the winter hasn’t provided though is a clear case of a team making a big leap forward into the play-off reckoning.

That’s not a complete surprise as the 2016/17 free agent class was one of the weakest of recent years. Additionally, three of the most appealing free agents had come to the end of their contracts with the Los Angeles Dodgers: Kenley Jansen, Rich Hill and Justin Turner. The Dodgers used their financial clout to keep the trio out of the clutches of any potential rivals and made a small quality free agent pool even smaller.

We should also not forget that the team that made the biggest noise over the previous winter was the Arizona Diamondbacks. To say that their plan – if we can call it that – didn’t work out would be a huge understatement. Winning the off-season doesn’t offer guarantees that you’ll win in the regular season.

However, there have been some interesting transactions completed and here are three teams worth keeping an eye on.

The Houston Astros were a relative disappointment in 2016 after their play-off appearance the previous year. They completed most of their off-season work early, making it easy to forget that they have made some decent additions. Carlos Beltran, Josh Reddick and Brian McCann have joined a batting lineup that was already one of the better units in the Majors. Whether their pitching staff will take a step forward could be the key question for their 2017 prospects.

The Seattle Mariners’ General Manager Jerry Dipoto should simply referred to as ‘The Trader’. He is always keen on making a deal and has completed plenty of trades this off-season, with the most notable additoins being Drew Smyly, Yovani Gallardo, Jean Segura, Mitch Haniger and Jarrod Dyson whilst Taijuan Walker, Nathan Karns and Seth Smith head the list of players that have been moved on. They finished second in the AL West in 2016, albeit a fair way behind division-winners Texas, and we’ll see if the cumulative effect of the trades have made them better or not.

Finally, the Colorado Rockies managed a surprising third-placed finish in the NL West last year, although their 75-87 win-loss record showed that was more down to Arizona and San Diego’s poor play than their own positive performance. Undeterred, they decided to up the ante by signing Ian Desmond to a five-year, $70m contract and then announced that the intention is for him to play at first base. It ranks as one of the more baffling decisions made in recent years, worth keeping an eye on for the ‘so crazy it just might work’ potential it has.