Category Archives: ‘Weekly’ Hit Ground Ball

Matt Smith’s Monday morning column, looking back at the previous week in MLB and looking ahead to the ‘early’ games scheduled for the week ahead

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Posey’s injury poses many questions

WHGB11The recent injury suffered by the San Francisco Giants’ catcher Buster Posey has led many to debate whether the rules should be changed to stop such collisions at the plate. 

I have always found it curious that this type of physical play is allowed to happen in the first place.  Baseball is typically a non-contact sport and allowing two players to collide in this way – the runner deliberately trying to smash the catcher, who is effectively a sitting duck – just seems odd. 

There’s no skill to it, the play is merely a test of misguided bravado.  It’s not ‘playing hard’, it’s ‘playing dumb’.

Still, plays at the plate are one of the most exciting parts of baseball.  That’s shown by the buzz that sweeps through the crowd when a player tags up or hurtles around third while the outfielder pegs the ball in from the outfield.  You don’t want to take that away from the game by changing the rules to greatly hand the advantage to one side.  It should be a contest, just one that involves skill (a masterful sweeping tag by the catcher, an acrobatic leap and slide by the runner etc) rather than muscle.

The incident and resulting injury have hit the headlines because of the person who ended up on the wrong end of the collision.  If it had happened to the Giants’ back-up catcher Eli Whiteside for example then – rightly or wrongly – it wouldn’t have generated such a loud reaction. 

Buster Posey is one of the brightest young stars in the game, a player of great importance to his team and the sort of talent that any baseball fan, regardless of their rooting interests, should be sad to see shelved for any length of time.  It’s natural that an incident involving him should raise concerns, but perhaps the Giants and Posey might have acknowledged them more before the incident even happened. 

On any given day a catcher could be involved in a close play at the plate.  If the potential loss of Posey would be so devastating, should he be put at such risk in the first place? 

Moving him to another fielding position would be going too far, certainly so early in his career.  If someone is a good catcher and can hit as well as Posey can then that’s a great advantage for any team.  However, there are ways that a catcher can protect himself through the position they take up when fielding a play at the plate.

Posey got himself into an awkward position to receive the ball and that clearly played its part in him suffering an injury.  Similarly you often see catchers blocking the plate and essentially challenging the baserunner to run them over if they want to score.  Posey didn’t quite do that in this case, Scott Cousins did have part of the plate to slide into, but it’s the sort of thing you see in the Majors time and again and it leaves you wondering how more injuries don’t occur. 

As Posey begins his recovery, the Giants should think about whether they can do more in helping their young star protect himself in future; working on his positioning and making it clear to him that he doesn’t have to put his body on the line.

This may make it harder to stop the runner in some cases, but the risk of letting a run score every now and then has got to be worth taking when the alternative is to lose the heartbeat of your team for a substantial length of time.

Pitchers should pitch in at the plate

In discussing Interleague play last week, I only made a brief mention of the issues caused by the two leagues playing by different rules.  Two National League games on ESPN America made me think about the topic more closely this week.

ESPN America was showing the game between the Tampa Bay Rays and Detroit Tigers before rain disrupted play and the channel turned its attention to the Washington Nationals-Milwaukee Brewers game instead. 

We joined the action just after Mike Morse had hit a home run off Zack Greinke to tie the game at 3-3.  It was the only blot on Greinke’s strong pitching performance and he backed that up with his first home run in a Brewers’ uniform.  It wasn’t a cheap effort either, sailing high through the sky and just bending the right-way around the foul pole. 

Greinke had previously hit a home run for the Royals during Interleague play and was known as a decent hitter prior to his professional pitching career.  He wasn’t the only pitcher swinging the lumber to good effect either.

The next night on ESPN America, Cliff Lee went 2-for-4 at the plate for the Phillies while driving in three runs.  Carlos Zambrano, probably the best-hitting pitcher in the Majors, had a 3-for-3 night against the Mets on Thursday as well.  Then you had the D-Backs’ Zach Duke hitting a three-run homer on Saturday against the Astros, and the Astros’ J.A. Happ hitting a longball of his own yesterday. 

Watching pitchers get key hits is one of the joys of National League play and most baseball fans also appreciate seeing a pitcher do the less-flashy, but equally important and skilful tasks such as laying down bunts to advance runners.  I don’t mind the two leagues playing by different rules; it adds something to the Majors by creating two slightly different styles of the game.  However, if consensus called for the rules to be aligned then there’s no doubt which way it should go. 

There are a very small number of genuinely star-level hitters who would be affected by the DH being discarded (demonstrated starkly on Saturday when the Toronto Blue Jays used Corey Patterson as a DH. Yes he hit a walk-off home run, but he’s still a long, long way from being an impact bat, as his lifetime sub .300 on-base percentage shows). On the other hand, pitchers taking their spot in the batting lineup forces managers into making additional tactical decisions about in-game substitutions and, more importantly, pushes pitchers into developing another side to their game.  That’s something all professional sportsmen should take pride in doing, even if that means using their athletic talent and dedication simply to become adequate at a particular skill.

Infielder Wilson Valdez’s recent pitching effort may have been something of a freak event, but pitchers stepping up to the plate should continue to be a regular part of baseball.

Seeing-eye singles

I keep hoping that the Twins will recover some good form to make my prediction that they would get to the World Series look marginally less silly.  Those hopes haven’t come to much yet.  All is not completely lost though.  Their loss against the Angels on Friday, letting a 5-0 lead slip in the final two innings, could have pushed them over the edge; however they followed it up with a stunning victory on Saturday.  Anthony Swarzak pitched eight shut-out innings in a spot start, taking a no-hitter into the eighth inning, and Danny Valencia hit a walk-off single in the tenth to win the game 1-0.  That showed a lot of character in Ron Gardenhire’s team.

Evan Longoria in the lead-off spot for the Rays?  Manager Joe Maddon is never afraid to try something unconventional and it might be just what’s needed to help the third baseman out of a slump.

It will take a while for the Giants’ gloom to lift, but Brandon Crawford really gave their fans something to smile about on Friday night. He became only the sixth player in Major League history to hit a grand slam in his first big league at-bat.

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Interleague play how it should be

WHGB11Fenway Park always radiates with history, yet Boston’s latest home series had an extra special quality to it.  The Chicago Cubs were in town for the first time since the 1918 World Series. 

The two teams came off the field on 11 September 1918 with Boston celebrating their third World Series win in four years.  Red Sox fans would never have believed that their team would wait 86 years to taste such sweet victory again.  Cubs fans would have been even more incredulous at the thought that by 2010 – and counting – their team still hadn’t lifted a trophy to put that World Series defeat to rest. 

And who would have thought the sides would wait until 2011 before meeting again in Boston.  Watching the Cubs and Red Sox playing at venerable Fenway was a real treat, particularly on Saturday when they wore retro 1918 uniforms. 

We have interleague play to thank for that series.  On its own, it is a decent argument in favour of the format that was introduced in 1997.  However, there are still plenty of arguments against it and they always get a vocal airing when interleague play comes around each season.

Prior to 1997, American League and National League teams only met in the World Series, with players from both leagues also meeting in the All-Star Game.  The division of the teams into two leagues is a legacy of baseball’s past that in many respects no longer seems relevant.  They play by slightly different rules, but for all intents and purposes, it’s all MLB in the end.

Consequently, only allowing two teams from ‘rival’ leagues to face each other every year would be unnecessarily restrictive.  In an age when we’re all used to having more choice than we can cope with, not taking advantage of a fuller range of different match-ups would be foolhardy.

A possible 2011 World Series between Texas and Philadelphia wouldn’t be the least bit undermined by their recent interleague series.  If anything, it adds an extra layer of intrigue.  Fans could look at the series just gone with visions of it being a possible prequel to the World Series, while if that does transpire then there will be a short, but not insignificant, recent history to refer back to.

Interleague play should be something special, something unique to add an extra feature to the MLB regular season.  The question is whether that uniqueness is being lost?

Most teams play 18 interleague games in a season and that’s possibly at least three games too many.  The timing of the games also could be improved.  Playing them altogether, or in two distinct blocks, would make them stand out as events during the year.  The recent splash of three games make no sense, there’s no time for a build up and the teams immediately head straight back into normal play. It’s only the occasional unique contest, such as the historic Cubs and Red Sox set, that avoid becoming just another series.

And then you come to the actual fixtures.  The interleague rivalries were part of the big plan, allowing teams in places such as New York, the Bay Area and Los Angeles to face each other.  However, now these teams meet six times every year and, again, it becomes just another part of the season. 

Others have noted the unfairness that interleague play adds to the schedule and how this will be exacerbated if the number of playoff teams increases to ten next year, as seems inevitable.  

With the playoff expansion likely to take place, it’s a good time to make a wider assessment of the MLB schedule.  I’m all for keeping interleague play so long as it produces unique contests more consistently than at present. 

Breakfast time baseball

Checking MLB.com over breakfast is a daily ritual for me.  Normally it’s a case of being able to catch up on all of the games that had taken place while Britain slept, but occasionally we’re treated to some live breakfast-time baseball. 

We don’t get to enjoy it all that often, but every now and then a west coast game runs on for longer than normal and is still in progress as the kettle boils and cereal is sleepily poured into a bowl here in Britain.

I was able to munch down my cornflakes last Tuesday morning while watching the A’s playing the Angels.  The game was originally scheduled to start at 7.05 p.m. local time in Oakland, making for a less-hospitable 3.05 a.m. start here.  However, a 1 hour 25 minute rain delay meant that the game didn’t get underway until 4.30 UK time.

The A’s were trailing 4-3 as I logged on at 7 a.m. and my initial delight at having a live Oakland game on at breakfast time soon turned into thoughts that it might not be such a welcome surprise after all.  Watching your team lose to a fierce division rival before you’ve had time to finish a cup of tea is hardly getting your day off to a good start. With two outs in the bottom of the ninth, it seemed that my walk to work would feel longer than usual.

Thankfully, my fears were soon allayed in dramatic fashion.  Coco Crisp got on base with a single, stole second and was then driven home by Daric Barton to tie the game and send it to extras.  The Aussie Grant Balfour got three strikeouts to shutdown the Angels in the top of the tenth and Mark Ellis grounded-home the game-winning run in the bottom of the frame. 

A come from behind, walk-off win over breakfast: is there a better way to start your day? 

Seeing-eye singles

The rivalry between the Reds and Cardinals shows no signs of diminishing.  Even the commentators are getting in on the argument now, with the Reds’ Hall-of-Famer Marty Brennaman angering the Cards’ skipper Tony La Russa by branding Chris Carpenter a “whiner and excuse-maker”.  No doubt some killjoy – probably going by the name Bud Selig – will step in and try to take the spice out of it.  While it may make for a better corporate image for all concerned to act professionally, some petty, playground-style verbal jousting adds to the fun for me.

Bad news for the Indians this week as Grady Sizemore, Trafis Hafner and Alex White all went on the Disabled List.  Most have been waiting for Cleveland to cool off from their hot start and they can’t afford to lose too many players.  Still, a sweep of the Reds was a good way to make up for their losses, in the short term at least.

In more positivie injury news, Josh Hamilton and Nelson Cruz could both come off the DL for the Rangers today, while the Phillies may finally get to see Chase Utley start his Major League season soon as well.  Both teams can be forgiven if they are cautious in how they bring those players back into action.  They will be key players if their respective teams are to be successful this season and if that means taking a day or two off here and there during the end of May and start of June, so be it.

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Throwing strikes

WHGB11As fans in the UK, we’re used to focusing more on day games played in the States as those are normally the ones that we can catch live.  However, some night-game match-ups are too good to miss and that was certainly true last Tuesday.

The Phillies and Marlins were meeting in Florida, with Roy Halladay and Josh Johnson taking the mound.  What more could you ask for from a pitching match-up? 

It was the master against the apprentice; Halladay being the reigning NL Cy Young winner and Johnson watching Halladay’s bullpen sessions and picking his brain at last year’s All-Star Game.  A ten past midnight UK start was no hardship with those two pitching.

It is always helpful if games in the early hours move along at a decent pace, holding the need for sleep at bay for a few hours, and Jimmy Rollins grounding out on the very first pitch suggested that this game was going to go by quickly.

There are many factors that make Halladay and Johnson so devastating, but two of the most important are that they can throw all their different pitches for strikes and that they attack batters by pounding the strikezone, rather than nibbling at the corners.  Johnson is learning to do this more consistently this year and the results are there for all to see.  In the first inning, 9 of Johnson’s 10 pitches were strikes, for Halladay it was 10 from 12.

An unrelenting strike-throwing approach creates a fascinating dynamic between the pitcher and hitter.  If a pitcher is attacking the strikezone then there is some merit in going up there swinging, knowing that if you’re passive at the plate you will soon find yourself down 0-2. 

However, quick outs only hand a greater advantage to the pitcher who can carry that momentum forward and go deeper into games, and that’s what makes the likes of Halladay and Johnson so formidable.  It’s not that they simply throw strikes – strikes down the middle of the plate will be hit a mile in the Majors – they throw strikes on the corners that invariably the hitter can’t do much with even if they do make contact. 

Halladay was particularly impressive (as always) in this respect, while Johnson had to deal with a few more baserunner early on; however one person that Halladay didn’t throw strikes to was his opposing pitcher.

Halladay walked Johnson in the third inning.  It was the first time he had ever walked a pitcher (he has spent most of his career in the American League, of course) and he made his frustration clear by yelling “god dammit!”.  I had to laugh when the commentators kindly apologised to any viewers who had heard it.  It wasn’t exactly a vein-throbbing Wayne Rooney yelling an expletive directly down a camera.  Maybe we’ve found Halladay’s one weakness: he’s just not very good at being obscene.

Halladay also threw a wild pitch in the eighth inning which ultimately led to the Marlins’ winning run in a 2-1 final score.  It was a rare mistake from a great pitcher in what turned out to be an excellent game, one that was well worth losing some sleep over.

More pain for Morales

Walk-off home runs can be devastating for the team that has to trudge off the field as losers, but they shouldn’t be devastating for the team that crowds around the plate as the hero heads for home.

Kendrys Morales’ home run on 29 May 2010 has turned out to be a very hollow victory for the player and his club.  The Angels’ slugger fractured his lower left leg as he jumped onto the plate and missed the rest of the 2010 season.  Spring Training came and went without him returning to action and it was finally announced last Wednesday that Morales requires another surgical procedure that will rule him out for the whole of the 2011 season.

The Angels’ had a frustrating offseason, being outbid by the Red Sox and Rangers on Carl Crawford and Adrian Beltre.  Vernon Wells, the one player they did sign (in what can only be seen as a panic move), struggled through his first 35 games of the season before hitting the Disabled List with a groin strain. 

Despite all this and the absence of Morales, the Angels are firmly in the AL West race and their offence has been one of the better ones in the Majors. Mark Trumbo has performed admirably so far, but if he tails off during the season then you have to wonder what the Angels will do at first base as Morales’ return as an offensive force has to be in some doubt. 

A mid-season trade is unlikely considering that any potential trade partner will be asking for their outstanding prospect Mike Trout and/or Peter Bourjos to be included in any deal.  So that throws us forward to the offseason and the potential free agent first baseman Prince Fielder (and potentially Albert Pujols, although we’ll leave that matter to another day).  The Angels, Fielder’s agent Scott Boras and a lucrative multi-year contract for the Brew Crew basher don’t seem a likely combination judging by the way in which L.A. have refused to meet the high demands of top free agents in the last few years. 

Maybe recent disappointments on the free agent market and Morales’ continuing woes could make the Angels change their approach?

Seeing-eye singles

Jason Kubel had the Target Field crowd on their feet when he launched a three-run homer to give the Twins the lead against the Tigers on Wednesday.  It was a surprise to learn that this was the Twins’ first three-run jack of the 2011 season, although that reveals something about why they have started the year so poorly.  As did the way Jhonny Peralta reduced the crowd to a deathly hush when he put the Tigers back on top.

During the Giants-Cubs game on Friday, the commentators Len Kasper and Bob Brenly made an interesting observation about San Francisco’s starting pitcher Madison Bumgarner.  As Kasper noted, you often hear people talk of pitchers with a ‘short-arm’ delivery, yet Bumgarner is a model example of the exact opposite.  Whether new to baseball or not, it’s worth looking at Bumgarner’s pitching motion to get an idea of what a ‘long-arm’ delivery is like.  Worth also comparing it to someone like the Braves’ Tommy Hanson and how different motions can still be very effective.

I’ll never get used to the term ‘web gem’.  Let’s just call it an outstanding catch by the Washington Nationals’ (and Netherlands) outfielder Roger Bernadina.

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Colon’s impressive comeback

WHGB11He arrived as an uninspiring second prize to a team unaccustomed to accepting second best. 

The New York Yankee way was for Cliff Lee, the most-prized pitcher on the free agent market, to be stood in front of the cameras wearing pinstripes at a press conference.  Instead they had to make do with Bartolo Colon signing a Minor League contract.  No cameras, no fanfare, no bullish statement of intent to demoralize their rivals. 

And why would there be?  Here was a pitcher pushing 38 years old who hadn’t pitched at all in the Majors in 2010 and had battled through four injury-riddled seasons prior to that.  The Yankees were signing a former Cy Young award winner, but his 2005 season seemed a lifetime ago and there was no pretence that Cy Young form was expected from the new recruit. 

Colon had pitched well in the Dominican Winter League and the Yankees thought he was worth a flyer; a Minor League deal and an invite to Spring Training to see if he had anything left.  Against the odds, Colon won a place on the Yankees’ pitching staff as a long-reliever and when Phil Hughes went down, he was next in line to step into the rotation.

Two starts in and the Yankees couldn’t be happier with how he has done.  His eight-inning performance against the Chicago White Sox last Wednesday was particularly impressive. Showing a four-seam fastball that hit 96 MPH on the radar gun, he was able to keep an admittedly scuffling Sox lineup in check with relative ease after escaping from a bases-loaded jam in the second inning.  Continue reading

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: MLB and the Dodgers

WHGB11It’s a tale becoming all-too familiar to sports fans.

An iconic sports team is subject to a highly-leveraged takeover by someone without existing links to the club, giddy with excitement at the prospect of exploiting the history, tradition and fan base.  Initial scepticism is put to one side by many at first while the team does well, but slowly the financial burden placed on the organization starts to tell.  Spending on players goes down while the fans’ loyalty is exploited in rising ticket prices, concessions and merchandise. 

Fans of opposing teams may not have much sympathy when Liverpool FC, Man Utd or the Los Angeles Dodgers have their usually gilded lives blighted in such a way, but it’s a depressing development all the same.

MLB Commissioner Bud Selig this week used his ‘best interests of baseball’ powers to step in and take control of the Los Angeles Dodgers due to mounting concerns about the way the prestigious organization is being run. 

Judging by the articles and comments online, the news has been welcomed by the vast majority of Dodger fans.  The current owners, Frank and Jamie McCourt, are more than a match for the Glazers in the unpopularity stakes following the fall-out from their divorce.  Not only has it left their finances, and therefore the Dodgers’ finances, in disarray, but it also very publicly revealed that they were using the Dodgers to fund a lavish lifestyle for themselves and their family.

Frank McCourt reportedly borrowed $30m last week so that he could meet payroll obligations and Selig has decided enough is enough.  

The Premier League’s Chief Executive Richard Scudamore spends a considerable amount of time defending owners’ rights to spend what money they like and to use the business models they want.  While he has to look out for the reputation of the league as a whole, he doesn’t see it as his place to interfere any further. If he did interfere, that might make the next multi-billionaire decide to ‘invest’ his money elsewhere, or eventually make the top clubs decide to break away and run their own pan-European competition.

Selig will also defend owners to a large extent, essentially he does work for them after all, but MLB is a closed shop and that means those involved can have a much greater say in how it is run. 

Think of it this way: there’s a great banquet of billions of dollars laid out on the table and only 30 seats around it.  You can only grab a chair if one becomes available and you’re only allowed to sit yourself down if the others allow you to.  The owners have their differences and disputes, but ultimately it benefits them all to work together so that revenues continue to grow.  And if one of the marquee franchises in a major media market is being badly compromised by the owners’ financial problems, then the others don’t expect the Commissioner to sit idly by.

It may be a positive development for Dodgers fans desperate to see the back of the McCourts, but this move poses more questions than answers.  Reports are that Frank McCourt is considering suing Bud Selig and while it seems highly likely that the McCourts’ ownership is coming to an end, there’s no telling when that moment will come.  The Dodgers aren’t the only team under financial difficulties either, with the New York Mets’ ownership being embroiled in the Madoff affair.  Selig insists the two cases are different; however the history of MLB taking over teams in trouble (few will forget the way the Montreal Expos were handled by MLB) means that the prospect will inevitably hang over the Mets for the forseeable future.

Additionally there’s the thorny issue of how MLB’s involvement will impact the Dodgers and their competitors.  Should they be restricted in what they can do or be allowed to carry on as if nothing has happened? 

The Texas Rangers filed for bankruptcy last year during their protracted sale (Tom Hicks take a bow), yet they were able to trade for Cliff Lee (and take on his salary) and received a loan from MLB to help them through the season.  You could argue it was within an agreed budget and that Rangers fans shouldn’t have been denied the opportunity for their team to compete and, as it happened, to make it to the World Series.  If you’re a rival watching the Rangers fly past while you run your organization so that you don’t end up in a bankruptcy court, it might not seem quite so fair.

And we can’t overlook the fact that it was Bud Selig and the other owners who let the McCourts take control of the Dodgers in the first place.  Their faith proved misguided in that case and that often seems to happen.  MLB and the Premier League will downplay or pass off concerns if they want a deal to go through, or if they have little choice about it.  For all the rhetoric, the Premier League doesn’t have much in the way of powers to stop someone buying a team and in the Dodgers’ case it seems that the former owners’ (Rupert Murdoch’s FOX/News Corp) desire for the sale to proceed weighed heavy on the mind owing to their additional position as a major TV rights holder. 

The MLB bean counters accepted the McCourts’ plan despite concerns expressed at the time about their financial resources.  In fairness to MLB, no deal or business plan is risk-free and they surely wouldn’t have allowed the takeover to happen if they didn’t believe it could work.  Yet what does ‘work’ mean in this context?  It means running the team so that it continues to generate lots of revenue and keeps a decent product out on the field while channelling millions to pay off the loans used to buy it in the first place (possibly also to cover losses of other business interests as well).

The McCourts’ divorce has created this ultimate problem, but if they remained a happy couple today then the rising prices, plans to lower payroll and the use of money to fund an extravagant lifestyle (not to mention paying two sons $600k each despite neither of them really working for the team) would still be there. Selig wouldn’t have used his ‘best interests of baseball’ powers to do anything about it, or to do anything about it happening at any ballclub, because from a business standpoint if things are ticking along, there’s no real problem.

But is it in the ‘best interests of baseball’, or any other sport, to be run on those lines?

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Early season standings

WHGB11I looked at the MLB standings for the first time this season on Saturday morning.  I deliberately avoid them completely during the early stages of the campaign, at least until curiosity gets the better of me, and it isn’t until halfway through May that I check them on a regular basis.

The standings don’t mean all that much until teams have played a decent number of games.  Teams are just getting out of the gate, sometimes without their full complement of first-choice players.  A few games will be postponed here and there due to bad weather and win-loss records can be inflated or deflated due to the quality of opponent that each team has faced up to that point.

In short, you simply don’t get a sense of how good a team is, just how well they have performed over a relatively small number of games. 

However, that doesn’t mean the standings are devoid of any interest.  In fact, the occasional glimpses early on can be a source of great pleasure and intrigue.  You get a sense of how teams are doing by following individual results and winning or losing streaks every day, but checking how the teams stack up can still create a shock or two.

That was the case on Saturday.  Continue reading

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Manny being Manny for the final time

WHGB11Beyond the usual pleasure of whiling away a few hours watching a ballgame, there didn’t seem to be much particularly memorable about the Tampa Bay Rays’ game against the Los Angeles Angels on Wednesday.

Tampa Bay had lost their first four games of the season heading into the contest and there was a decidedly downbeat mood at Tropicana Field. 

The Trop is far from being the most atmospheric ballpark at the best of times.  The dome creates a sterile feeling, the artificial turf and blocking of the sun’s rays being an affront to the natural environment that baseball should be played in.  There were less than 12,000 fans in attendance during the day-game on Wednesday and mercifully few had cowbells in their hands.  The gentle hum of idle chatter was broken occasionally with a cheer or groan, but full-blown excitement was scarce.

This muted setting was understandable in light of the team’s 0-4 start and the run of bad luck that has plagued the home team in recent months.  Their penance for turning the world upside down and beating the free-spending Yankees and Red Sox to the AL East division last year was to lose a whole host of players, snapped up by rivals including New York (closer Rafael Soriano) and Boston (left-fielder Carl Crawford).

On top of those losses, the Rays had barely started their season when their batting star Evan Longoria suffered an oblique injury – seemingly the fashionable injury of choice for ballplayers, closely trailed by appendectomies – landing him on the Disabled List, where he’s likely to stay until the latter part of April. 

All of which meant that the crowd was waiting for something bad to happen, rather than holding onto the normal April optimism.  The Rays’ TV announcers even took time during the broadcast to provide a cookery lesson in the form of a military subsistence package that cooks when you add water to it.  “It’s definitely food” was the most enthusiastic thing commentator Brian Anderson could say about it and there was little enthusiasm elsewhere after the Angels took a first-inning lead. 

The game had all the hallmarks of one that would be an easily forgotten part of a losing sequence quickly wiped from the memory when better days arrive.  But you never know with baseball; every game has the potential to produce a moment that will last and that’s what happened in this case. Trailing 4-1 in the bottom of the eighth inning, with one runner on base and two outs, Manny Ramirez was summoned from the bench to pinch-hit.

Ramirez had been taken out of the lineup by manager Joe Maddon in response to the slugger going 1-for-16 to start the season.  “I really think he’s trying to carry too much of this load right now”, said Maddon. “I want him to understand that I’m seeing that, that I think he’s trying way too hard”.  It had been announced that Ramirez would miss Thursday’s game due to “personal matters”, but he was on the bench on Wednesday and Maddon decided to use him in this spot.

The Angels brought reliever Kevin Jepsen into the game and Ramirez sent his 2-1 pitch harmlessly into right field, where Torii Hunter made the catch to end the inning. What we didn’t know at the time was that the play had also marked the end of Manny’s career.

The news came through on Friday that Ramirez was retiring after “an issue” with MLB’s drug programme.  That issue was reportedly a failed drugs test during Spring Training and he decided to retire rather than sit through the second-offence penalty of a 100-game ban.   

It’s a curious part of the MLB drug programme that Ramirez’s decision leaves the whole matter in limbo.  Officially he hasn’t failed a test and the standard process hasn’t been completed.  This would only take place if Ramirez decided to play again, which isn’t going to happen.  The result is that he has retired under a cloud, with no definite facts being formally announced.  Did he indeed test positive for something, as is suspected?  If so, what banned substance was he found to have used?  Maybe the truth will out at some point, but that won’t be made official and that means it will be a case of conjecture and suspicion, rather than hard facts.

The lack of hard facts is exactly why evaluating players from the last twenty years or so will remain problematic.  Ramirez’s one positive test, and the suspected second, put more evidence towards his case than most others, but in some respects that only confuses things further. The testimonies from within the game upon his retirement tell you one thing: most consider Ramirez to be one of the greatest right-handed hitters of all time and the skills that made him such are extremely unlikely to have been enhanced to any significant extent by any substance.  So how do we evaluate his career?

That’s a very involved question for another day.  The immediate consequence of his sudden departure is that it gives Rays fans even more reason to be despondent.  Signing Ramirez was a calculated risk that hasn’t paid off and as he was only on a one-year/$2m deal, Tampa Bay don’t have a significant sum of money now available again to bring in a replacement.  While they were not expecting MVP-level numbers from him, Ramirez was there to add some power to the heart of the batting lineup and power is one of the most expensive commodities to buy or trade for.  Just like Manny’s standing in the history of the game, the Rays’ 2011 prospects are now in limbo.

Only Manny Ramirez could quietly walk away from the sport in such a noisy manner.

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Schedules from a British perspective

WhgbHlSqIt’s incredible when you think about it.  Teams in MLB play 162 games each, which should give ample opportunity to provide us with eight clear postseason clubs.  And yet every year, there are always several races that go right down to the wire. 

The teams go through their 162 game (sometimes more) marathon with the aim of ‘playing in October’.  The thing is, nowadays every team plays in October.

Even the Pittsburgh Pirates.

‘October’ is no longer interchangeable with the ‘postseason’. Not only does the regular season now extend past September, the World Series can extend into November as well.  That final point is something that MLB Commissioner Bud Selig has often expressed reservations about and now he is going to do something about it.

The provisional 2011 regular season schedule has been released and finally MLB has listened to the players and shortened Spring Training.  Not by much, only a few days in fact, but the end result is that the season will be completed in September and the World Series will be played one week earlier.  The hunt for October will once again be everybody’s true primary target.  Continue reading

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Halman debuts in a memorable game

WhgbHlSqThursday was a great day for European baseball.  Greg Halman took the field at the Rogers Centre for the Seattle Mariners and became the latest Dutchman to make the Major Leagues.  Halman was born in Haarlem and developed his game as a youngster in the Netherlands before taking his career Stateside.

Halman went 0-for-4 in his debut, but it will still be an unforgettable experience for the player and the game will leave a trace in the baseball record books as well.

Ichiro Suzuki went into the game against the Toronto Blue Jays with 198 hits on the season.  With Halman watching from the Mariners’ dugout, Ichiro made it to 199 with a double in the third inning and then rounded it up to 200 with a single in the fifth (Halman led off both innings, striking out and grounding out). 

In doing so, Ichiro set a Major League record for consecutive seasons with 200 hits.  He’s achieved the feat in all ten seasons since arriving in Seattle from Japan.  Only the ‘hit king’ Pete Rose can match Ichiro’s ten 200-hit seasons and Rose’s longest consecutive streak was three years (1968-1970).  Halman won’t need to be told how lucky he is to be playing on the same team as such an extraordinary talent.

He was also in prime position to watch another historic hit, albeit one which was not so welcome to the Mariners. 

Jose Bautista hit his fiftieth home run of the season with two outs in the bottom of the first inning off Felix Hernandez.  It was one of only two hits that Hernandez gave up in the game and was the only run scored, so Bautista certainly didn’t get to fifty in a cheap way.

Bautista has joined an exclusive club, containing only twenty-six members from the history of the Majors, of players who have hit at least fifty long balls in a season. 

It’s interesting to look at how the membership has grown since Babe Ruth created the club in 1920.  The feat was achieved just seventeen times between 1920 and 1977 and only once more between then and the 1995 season (Cecil Fielder, Prince’s father, hit 51 in 1990).  However, Bautista’s shot meant that it has happened twenty-four times in the last sixteen seasons.

The shadow of steroids will rear its ugly head as an explanation and it’s possible that they may have been a contributory factor in some cases. However you could also list any number of other factors that may have influenced this power-hitting phenomenon: the design of new ballparks, the type of baseballs being used, and the better conditioning of players plus the medical care available to them to name just three.

Whatever combination you want to put it down to, it is a quite astonishing jump.

In relation to Bautista, the name from the more recent crop of the ‘50 club’ that stands out is Brady Anderson.  Both players reached the total despite having a relatively low season-high total before their breakout year.  Anderson reached the fifty mark in the final game of the Baltimore Orioles’ 1996 season and before then his highest total had been twenty-one in 1992.  As noted in last week’s column, Bautista’s highest total prior to this season was sixteen in 2006.  

Anderson went straight back down to eighteen home runs in 1997 and his best season total after that point was twenty-four in 1999.  It will be interesting to see whether Bautista follows a similar path or if he goes the other way and joins the even-more exclusive list of players (currently nine in total) who have hit fifty home runs in a season twice.

In any case, Bautista has now hit the fifty mark once and that alone puts him in the record books.  Maybe someday Greg Halman will earn a mention in there too.

Don’t think too much

My favourite home run of the past week wasn’t historic and it wasn’t particularly important either.  It came in the Friday day-game at Wrigley Field between the St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago Cubs. 

The Cardinals’ Allen Craig had worked a 3-2 count in the bottom of the first inning with two runners on base and the Cubs’ battery of Tom Gorzelanny and Koyie Hill was undecided as to what pitch to throw next.  Hill ran through several combinations of signs and was met by only a shake of the head from his pitcher.  The catcher got out from his squat and jogged to the mound, not only to talk it over with Gorzelanny but also to end Albert Pujols’ fun of staring straight in at the signs from second base.

After the routine, yet always amusing, sight of pitcher and catcher talking through their gloves, Hill and Gorzelanny returned to their positions.  With their deeply considered plan of attack agreed, Gorzelanny went into his wind-up and delivered the pitch.

And Craig casually golfed it into the bleachers for a three-run home run.

You can just imagine what former manager Lou Piniella would have made of it had he been in the dugout.  The phrase ‘better off out of it’ springs to mind.

Weekly Hit Ground Ball: Don’t wake up

WhgbHlSqThe Colorado Rockies’ recent run ensured that their game against the Los Angeles Dodgers would make for entertaining viewing on Saturday evening.  Watching on MLB.TV offered the additional benefit of listening to the legendary broadcaster Vin Scully calling the action and, in particular, commenting on the recent form of the Rockies’ shortstop Troy Tulowitzki.

Scully has been calling Dodgers games for 61 years and counting and there’s no one better able to put historic feats or memorable performances into perspective.  There was a sense of wonder in Scully’s voice as he relayed the numbers that Tulowitzki had put up over the preceding fourteen games as he arrived in the batter’s box in the first inning.  Scully had just finished stating the stats when the Dodgers’ starting pitcher John Ely threw a change-up down the middle of the plate to Tulowitzki.

“Look out, he’s hit another one!”, exclaimed Scully.

So he had, and he would do so again in the fifth inning.  The two blasts made it fourteen home runs in fifteen games prior to Sunday, a sequence that began on 3 September against the San Diego Padres.  Tulowitzki had hit twelve home runs in the 2010 season before that point, nine of which came before spending five weeks on the disabled list between mid-June and the end of July.  Continue reading