Monthly Archives: November 2010

Eight Men Out by Eliot Asinof

Eight Men Out by Eliot Asinof (Holt Paperbacks, 1987), 302 pages

EmoThe 1919 Black Sox scandal, in which eight Chicago White Sox players accepted money to ‘throw’ the World Series, is one of the most infamous sporting events of the 20th century.  Eliot Asinof’s book about the episode is acknowledged as the definitive account of all that transpired, both during the event and in the aftermath.

Eight Men Out’s credentials as an essential book for any baseball fan therefore are well established and recent events have only made it seem all the more powerful.

The basic story of the Black Sox scandal, including the mournful ‘Say it ain’t so, Joe’ refrain, are well known.  Indeed, plenty of people at the time were aware, or strongly suspected, that the Series wasn’t being played on the level.  Hugh Fullerton sat in the press box circling plays on his scorecard that didn’t look quite right, catcher Ray Schalk visibly raged at his pitchers failing to perform to their usual standards.  It was the worst-kept secret in town, pushed to one side only due to many deciding not to believe what they heard or saw.

What really happened was less well-known.  Even the players involved didn’t know all the details, not even half of them, of how the fix was put in place and actually carried out.  Our current familiarity with the tale is largely due to Asinof’s feat of tireless research and detective work that culminated in the release of this book in 1963.  Even with court transcripts and mountains of contemporary newspaper coverage, his work in sifting through the rumours and dead-ends to tell a tale that those involved never wanted to be known was a monumental achievement.

Asinof covers the whole affair: how the fix was organized, how the series actually played out, the occasionally farcical court trial that followed and the longer-term impact it had on baseball and those involved.  This edition also includes an introduction from the late Stephen Jay Gould that helps to place both the scandal and this book into context, although any reader will become aware of the wider themes addressed.

There have been several recent high-profile scandals involving allegations of match-fixing and the modern practice of ‘spot fixing’, often leading sports writers to make reference to the Black Sox of baseball’s past.   The English cricket summer was played out under a dark shadow due to allegations against members of the Pakistan cricket team, for instance.  The situation raised the same questions that baseball fans struggled with in 1920 as the sorry saga was revealed: how could it happen and why would players (allegedly) get involved in such things?  The focus rested squarely on the players, who may have been culpable but were mere pawns in a larger game in which the real levers of power always remained out of sight and out of reach.

Eight Men Out isn’t just a textbook study of how the fixing of sporting contests can come about.  It also provides an object lesson in what can happen when a sport is faced with a potentially devastating scandal.  Reading Eight Men Out today, it’s hard not to draw clear parallels with baseball’s recent crisis: the so-called steroid era.

In both cases, plenty of people knew what was happening, but it was easier not to rock the boat and draw negative publicity onto the sport. 

The home-run hitting feats of Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Barry Bonds et al were the perfect way for baseball to recapture the hearts of a nation that had questioned its love of the sport due to the 1994/95 labour disputes and subsequent strike.  Fans piled into ballparks once again, just as they had in 1920 when the season was building to an exciting finish.  As Asinof memorable states: “the dirty rumours of last fall had been buried in the excitement of the pennant race.  [White Sox owner Charles] Comiskey counted his money and let them lie”

However, such events refuse to stay secret forever and it’s important to make sure that when the worst does happen, it happens on the sport’s own terms.  That’s ultimately how the ‘Black Sox Scandal’ ended up, with the eight players being acquitted in court but still all banned for life from baseball, leading Asinof to surmise:

“So, in the end, baseball won its battle.  They had rescued the ballplayers from the clutches of the law, only to make victims of them on their own terms.  Baseball, the club owners could boast, had cleaned its own house”. 

The very same thing could be said about MLB’s Mitchell Report into the steroid era: a self-imposed process designed to make scapegoats of a few players and to head-off the potential of someone else doing a thorough investigation instead. 

And there is a final clear link between the Black Sox and the steroid era.  As ballplayers were put in front of Congress while many other tainted sportsmen were left alone, it was claimed that baseball still held a special place in America’s heart and that the players were therefore held to a higher standard than their sporting contemporaries.  So it was back in 1919/1920: “America expected higher morals from ballplayers than they expect from businessmen – or anyone else, for that matter”.

Eight Men Out really is essential reading, not just for baseball fans but for fans of all sports.  It’s a fascinating story, brilliantly researched and written, that still packs a powerful punch because the central themes it explores are as relevant, and as important, today as they were all those years ago.

Have you read “Eight Men Out”? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments section below. Can you recommend any other similar books? If so, let us know.

2010 Season Review: NL West

MlbHlSqWe’re going to look back at each of the six Major League divisions one-by-one over the next six weeks.  We start with the home of the 2010 World Series champions.

BaseballGB predictions

Joe Dodgers
Mark Rockies (WC: Dodgers)
Matt Rockies
Russ Rockies (WC: Giants)
Steve Rockies

 

San Francisco Giants (92-70)

The Giants’ World Series triumph was an incredible story.  Their pitching staff was certainly ‘World Series worthy’, yet the offence was patchy at best for much of the season and they were not your typical dominant force defeating all-comers on the road to glory.  They pushed past the Padres midway through September and almost came unstuck in the final series of the season, only securing their playoff place with a win over San Diego on the final day.

It was almost a case of their great pitching going to waste.  Instead, they snuck into the postseason and then rode the crest of a wave all the way to the big prize.  

The question then is can this relatively unfancied World Series-winning team retain their title in 2011?  The pitching staff is likely to be just as good, while Buster Posey is a fantastic young player to build an offence around.  Some would say that if this 2010 Giants team can win a World Series then there are plenty of others good enough to win it all in 2011.  That may be true, but it’s also true that the Giants will be one of those teams in the mix.   Continue reading

Oakland A’s make some early moves

MlbHlSqGood things come to those who wait, or so the saying goes. 

So what should I make of the Oakland A’s bursting into life this week and picking up three new players, while most teams are merely laying groundwork for possible deals? 

The natural reaction would be one of interest but little excitement.  David DeJesus is a relatively punch-less outfielder who has had injury problems of late;  not the sort of player that the A’s are exactly short of already.  Edwin Encarnacion brings some much-needed power, but he doesn’t have the most refined approach at the plate and his fielding at third base leaves a lot to be desired.  Hisashi Iwakuma(*) might be a revelation, or he could follow the disappointments of Daisuke Matsuzaka and Kei Igawa in failing to justify their posting fees from Japan.

All of which makes it unlikely that the reigning American League champs, the Texas Rangers, will be overly concerned that the A’s have greatly improved. 

However, I can’t help but be optimistic about what General Manager Billy Beane has done over the past week.  I’m not suggesting that the A’s had to pounce before others snapped up DeJesus and Encarnacion.  They are potentially useful players, no more than that.  In fact Encarnacion might even be dropped before Spring Training comes around. 

However, there are other potential targets out there that could help push the A’s from being a promising group to genuine contenders in the AL West.  Beane has decided to strike early, not to set up his team for the 2011 season, but to set up the rest of the A’s offseason.

The 2010 Oakland A’s had an impressive pitching staff and one of the best defences in the Majors, two factors that give the team genuine hope that they can compete for the West in 2011.  However, the offense didn’t pull its weight.  The A’s hit just 109 home runs compared to the American League average of 158, a deficiency that can’t just be explained by their pitcher-friendly home ballpark. 

Several expensive contracts have come off the A’s books this offseason (Eric Chavez and Ben Sheets to name the two most notorious) and some fans had dreamed that the team might use their payroll flexibility to pick up a big bat or two.  Beane has been quick to play down expectations though, noting that flexibility on the 2011 budget doesn’t help much with free agents like Jayson Werth and Adam Dunn as they will be looking for, and will get, multi-year deals. 

So, as always, the A’s have to be creative and that’s where these early deals come into their own.  Iwakuma will add yet another arm to a strong, but young, pitching staff and as every knows, you can never have enough good pitchers.  If they need to flip a pitcher to get a hitter, they will not be left short even after trading Vin Mazzaro for DeJesus.

DeJesus himself is a useful player and the A’s can now look towards the rest of the offseason knowing that they’ve already got some pieces to mix and match in the outfield if they can’t add an outfielder with power the rest of the way.  As already noted, Encarnacion has his limitations, but he does provide some thump and, again, that could be useful if another infielder cannot be landed.

The A’s can’t just go out and get the players they want.  More than most teams, they have to give themselves plenty of options before seeing how the Hot Stove pans out and taking advantage of what opportunities arise a few months down the line.  These three deals leave them well placed to do just that.

(* I should add that Iwakuma hasn’t actually signed a contract with the A’s yet, but everything I’ve read makes it seem like the A’s are very confident an agreement will be reached)

Emma Morgan wins first annual British Baseball Photography Competition

bbpcCongratulations to Emma Morgan, who was recently awarded the winning prize by the judges of the 2010 British Baseball Photography Competition. To see Emma’s winning shot, as well as the runners-up photos and some entries receiving honourable mentions, visit the gallery here. A story on the competition (and a parallel competition for softball) can be found on the BSUK website.

Thanks are owed to all 22 photographers who submitted shots during the course of the competition. In all, this group emailed through a combined 129 photos of British baseball in 2010.

Details of the 2011 competition will be posted in the new year.

Giants show free agents aren’t always as important as they may seem

MlbHlSqThe Hot Stove is bubbling and the top fee agent names, alongside plenty of lesser lights who are out of contract, are the focus of endless trade rumours once again.

It’s always a lot of fun following the stories throughout the offseason, but the San Francisco Giants’ recent World Series triumph shows that free agent signings can turn out to be less important than they seem during the long winter months.

The Giants’ two biggest earners were acquired via free agency and they have both proved to be poor acquisitions. 

Pitching was/is the Giants’ strength, but they won the World Series despite leaving an $18.5m starter out of the rotation throughout the postseason. Barry Zito has been as disappointing as many expected since signing his seven year/$126m contract in December 2006.  Meanwhile outfielder Aaron Rowand was pushed to the margins during the postseason and is owed $24m over the next two seasons.

The Giants’ main free agent signing one year ago was Mark DeRosa and he missed the vast majority of the 2010 season due to injuries.  His absence didn’t hurt them too much in the end. 

What made the difference for the Giants was their outstanding home-grown pitching staff  (Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain, Jonathan Sanchez and Madison Bumgarner all came through the Giants’ farm system) and some relatively cheap, fill-in player pick-ups like Cody Ross (claimed off waivers) and Pat Burrell (salvaged from the Rays’ scrapheap).   Continue reading