One story has dominated the baseball landscape since it came to light on Thursday. Manny Ramirez’s fifty-game suspension for “a violation of Major League Baseball’s Joint Drug Prevention and Treatment Program” marks the first time that a big name has been caught out and he probably won’t be the last.Â
The reaction to the news says a great deal about the way in which MLB has struggled to come to terms with the issue of banned substances.Â
There’s no need to rake over old ground in any great detail. The concise history of baseball’s relationship with drugs is that the sport collectively buried its head in the sand for years. This has placed a question mark over the performances and achievements of an entire era and has left the upper echelons of MLB incapable of dealing with the issue. Every incident leads to baseball being attacked from all sides, with MLB failing to protect itself.
A percentage of ballplayers take drugs, just as a percentage of athletes in all sports do. That’s not a dirty secret and it shouldn’t come as any surprise. It’s cheating and cheating takes place in all walks of life every single day.Â
If 1,000 pupils take an exam, the chances are that one or two will try and cheat. They need a good grade to get into university, they know they haven’t put the work in and are going to flunk it, so in desperation they try and get hold of the exam questions early. It happens. If fifty people apply for a job, some will be completely honest on their CV, some will be a little liberal with the truth and one or two will outright lie. They know that they will be in severe trouble if they get the job and are found out, but they take that chance.
The same holds true in sports, regardless of the game being played. Taking so-called performance-enhancing drugs is one perceived way to illegally gain an advantage (i.e. cheat); therefore there will always be people willing to risk it. Baseball appears to be the favourite whipping boy for many, but other sports should bear this in mind before jumping on the baseball-bashing bandwagon. Even the outward appearance of a ‘clean’ sport might hide a less wholesome truth.
Take football as an example. A big match will be seen by millions on TV, the game will be captured by a multitude of cameras, every major incident will be replayed many times after the event and newspapers, radio shows and websites will discuss them for days afterwards.Â
Despite being fully aware of the level of scrutiny they are under, a significant number of players cheat on a regular basis. A striker may know that a defender’s outstretched leg didn’t quite catch him, but he will still flick his heels back, chuck himself to the ground and roll about to try and con the referee into awarding a penalty. A player that gets a slight push in the chest can still be seen clutching his face and falling to the floor as if Manny Pacquiao has just landed a left hook on his jaw. Although it won’t be a conscious thought in their mind at that moment, the player knows that the incident will clearly show he has cheated, but it doesn’t stop them trying to gain an advantage.
It is impossible that, within this culture, there are not a minority of footballers who take performance-enhancing drugs, even if they don’t get caught. For a football fan like myself (although Norwich City are sorely testing my loyalty right now) to believe otherwise is to take a giant and unmerited leap of faith.
There will always be a minority that want to gain an illegal advantage and that means a drug-testing programme is a necessity.
There are three sides to a drug-testing programme. The first is that the vast majority of players will not want to take drugs and the testing allows them to prove they do not (although sadly this is up for debate). The second is that some players considering going down the drug route decide against it partly because the risk of being caught, and the punishment they will receive, is deemed too high. Thirdly, there will always be some players who weigh up the risks and rewards and make a conscious decision to take drugs. The testing is there to catch them and to punish them.
After years of inaction, the MLB of 2009 includes a strict and effective drug-testing programme. If you have such a programme, you are going to catch people taking drugs. The only way this can be avoided is if: a) not a single player takes drugs – a utopian vision that, as explained above, goes against human nature – or b) the programme is not effective and some players are able to use drugs without them being detected.Â
The best PR company in the world couldn’t spin Manny Ramirez’s positive test into a completely positive story, but any organization with some foresight (i.e. the knowledge that some players will take drugs and that you are going to catch them) and a sensible approach would be able to draw positives from it.Â
Clearly some media outlets will want to take this story down the “Shock! Horror! Baseball is gripped by drugs” route and milk it for all it’s worth. However MLB should have a clear strategy in place for how they will handle the inevitable event of a star player testing positive. If they’ve got one, it’s not been noticeable over the last few days.
Politicians and fans have called for baseball to clean up its act; why haven’t MLB taken ownership of the news and used it to highlight exactly what they have achieved in this regard? Where are all the heavy hitters explaining that, far from being “a dark day for baseball”, the news actually shows the strict drug-testing programme is working? Why has Bud Selig not acknowledged that a small minority will break the rules (knowingly or not) and that Raimrez’s positive test is proof that those players will be caught and severely punished?
The answer is that MLB is scared of its own shadow. Selig knows they screwed up in the past and issuing anything more than a short factual statement could lead to people asking questions about previous conduct that he doesn’t want to answer. Maybe the situation will only improve when Selig leaves his post, but baseball fans shouldn’t have to wait that long for those in charge to stand up for the sport they love.Â
Raimrez’s positive test is a blow to the sport and such news will always create unwelcome headlines, but MLB should have been able to counter them. If MLB continues to test players, the one certainty is that another notable player will be caught somewhere down the line.Â
Sadly, it’s less certain whether MLB will deal with the situation any better than they have done this time.
Here is the thing, As a fan I don’t really care about this story. I really don’t think that it is relavent to the Game on the Field. My own personal opinion is that this story has been mishandled by the American Media from day one. They have basically covered it from a bias of Public Morality. There are Are “sports journalists”(and I use that term loosely), who simply can’t come to terms with the fact that the records of their boyhood idols, were broken. They didn’t want to deal with this.
American outlets have made several mistakes in their coverage of this story and they have been doing this since day one; leaving out several key bits of information that are relavent to the individual cases of players such as Bonds, McGwire, Palmerio and Sosa.
The first thing they have left out was that Andro, the substance McGwire used, was and to the best of my knowledge legal in the United States of America at the time it was found in his locker. Infact, it was not even on the banned substance list at the time. Therefore Mark McGwire did not cheat and operated with in the peramiters of the game. Yet, writers want to deny him his place in the hall of fame because they label him “a cheater”.
Similarly, HGH was not made illegal in the United States of America until December of 2003. During the time he was alleged to have used it. It wasn’t on the Banned substance list and was not illegal in the United STates. Yet, Bonds is labeled a cheater. In September of 2003, Federal Authorities raided Bond’s home and seized several item in anticipation of New Law taking affect. Federal Prosecutors have been unable to charge Bonds with possession, and have had to charge him with purjury. Bonds can not be prosecuted for possession because at the time he used, HGH was not illegal and to charge would be a direct violation of his rights under the United States Constitution. But when did any sports writer ever care about that?
Secondly, writers have failed to take into consideration the changes that happened in the game during the ‘1990’s which had an impact on the number of homeruns. These included two rounds of expansion within a five year period, smaller ballparks, and a strikezone which did not conform with the way that it was written in the rulebook. All these factors contributed to the offensive explosion of the late ’90’s and offer a complex picture of what actually went on. Sportwriters does like complex explanations. STeriods are a simple although wrong explanation.
Thirdly, there is actually no scientific definition of performance enhancement and there is no scientific or statistical evidence to show that so called Performance Enhancing Drugs actually work. Yes, we know that steriods actually build up muscle mass and help people recover quicker. However, the muscles obtained through tsteriods are less flexible than muscles obtained naturally and therefore are most likely to cause the user to get hurt and go on the disabled lists; Jose Canseco is a prime example of this.
But they are not helpful in actually hitter a baseball. This is a skill that requires hand eye coordination. I could gain thiry pounds of muscle but it wouldn’t help me because I can’t hit a baseball to save my life. I ran accross a statistical analysis of Alex Rodreguiez time in Texas, and it showed that the drugs he was taken helped him hit a grand total of two homeruns. That’s hardly a statistically significant increase in his performance. That analysis can be found here: http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2009/02/what-impact-did-steroids-have-on-alex-rodriguezs-home-run-performance/
Yet, the American media doesn’t want to report this. By not reporting this they do themselves and the fans of this great game a disservice. They have caused a panic, and spread innuendo which does nobody anygood.
Part of this maybe explained in the way sportswriters get their “stories”. They primarily rely on unnamed sources and players speaking off the record. They don’t apply many of the techniques of solid investigative journalism to their trade. If they had, this story would have been fleshed out and we would have gotten a fuller picture of what went on Years ago. But sports writers don’t seem to have a problem with it and disregard the dangers that using unnamed sources bring. Not everysource is out to tell the truth. Sometimes they have an agenda.
I am sorry, I can not find myself getting angery with anyone who ever used performance enhancing drugs. I can not in good conscience say that what they did was cheating because in many situations it wasn’t. This sorry has been so missrepresented that it has cause the game I love to be sullied. I will not stand for that.
i dont think it should be a fifty game suspension if you get taking drugs. it should be a lifetime ban thats the only way get the message across
Matt and Joe Gray: Hi guys! It has been a long time since I have posted. My high school team keeps me busy! We are doing well, playing 4 games a week plus practice on 2 days. Usually one day of “rest” for the boys. Hope all is well with you two. I’ll comment more as summer arrives. Still have games to coach, but more time as school is out. Chico
Hi Chico. Good to hear from you, as always.
Joe. I try not to use the phrase ‘performance-enhancing drugs’ too much as I agree that it’s a very subjective description.